We Are the Lightning: Choosing Humanity’s Future in the Age of AI

In recent discourse about AI, we're often presented with competing extremes: dystopian despair or blind techno-optimism. Yet, broadly speaking, we've moved past debating whether or not powerful AI will emerge. With generative AI rapidly approaching the equivalent of having "one billion PhDs" at our fingertips, we are now unified on its trajectory. The question on everyone's lips has become: what will humans choose to do with it?

This pivotal shift was especially clear at Abundance360, an exponential technology summit, where the dialogue became more nuanced—recognizing that we stand precariously balanced on a knife's edge, with multiple speculative futures still possible. Critically, this is now fundamentally a human story. Mo Gawdat introduced a provocative scenario: "We are headed for a dystopia before a utopia," emphasizing the uncertainty inherent in this moment. His core insight was that the true risk isn't AI itself, but the intentions and actions of humans. Humans, not machines, will author the reality that emerges.

Gawdat's observation underscores our profound responsibility: if humans can trigger catastrophe, we can equally forge an abundant alternative.

This tension resonated even more deeply in an after-hours discussion on "the meaning of life," led by Salim Ismael. Here, participants grappled with a stark existential question: if life's fundamental imperative is growth, our greatest fear becomes entropy—the collapse into disorder. AI’s exponential trajectory could intensify this fear, outpacing humanity and leaving us behind.

Bill Gross provided a critical counterpoint to this speculative risk. He observed that generative AI now grants humanity access to knowledge equivalent to "one billion PhDs," representing an unprecedented creative resource if deliberately harnessed. Gross posed an essential challenge: what extraordinary futures might emerge if we intentionally direct this vast cognitive power? His insight offers neither blind optimism nor passive caution, but rather highlights humanity’s practical capacity to purposefully shape AI’s exponential power.

Cathie Wood reinforced this optimistic vision by grounding it in economic fundamentals, highlighting the significant compounding returns still to be unlocked from five converging innovation platforms—AI, robotics, energy storage, blockchain, and multi-omics. Wood drew historical parallels, such as the shift from agrarian societies to the Industrial Revolution, when previously unpaid tasks evolved into monetized labor. Similarly, today's unpaid responsibilities, like parents driving their children to school, could soon become new economic opportunities through innovations like autonomous vehicles. Wood argued convincingly that this convergence of exponential technologies could realistically drive global GDP growth toward 10%, offering humanity "more of a shot" at prosperity than many currently anticipate.

Adding practical reassurance, Travis Kalanick remarked, "robots don’t have bank accounts." He argued straightforwardly that technology, including AI, fundamentally exists to serve human needs. Drawing from entrepreneurial experience, he stated: "I've done companies that have failed, and the main reason they failed was nobody wanted what I made. If you want success, you have to make people's lives better—lots of people's lives better." In other words, the future economy still hinges entirely on human value, trust, and intentionality.

Ultimately, the choice of where we land is ours. Poet Sekou Andrews embodied this truth vividly in his own story, breaking boundaries as he built a pioneering career as a spoken-word poet—a path many considered impossible. On stage, Sekou ignited us with a demonstration of human lightning: "We look at these exponential technologies with our eyes pressed to the sky. Meanwhile, that sky is waiting to get its charge from the convergence in you and I."

Sekou reminds us that our greatest power is not merely individual sparks of inspiration, but the extraordinary potential generated by our collective collaboration. AI alone does not determine our future; humans do.

We stand at a precarious moment, facing multiple speculative futures. The path ahead will likely be messy, challenging, and uncertain—but by actively choosing to harness our collective lightning, we give ourselves a meaningful chance of shaping the future we desire. Lightning alone guarantees nothing, but harnessed intentionally, it provides us the fighting chance we need to strive toward the utopia we seek.

Would love to hear your thoughts! As ever, contact me at [email protected] or by responding to this email.